Return to blog

Landlord Basics

Approved—with Conditions? The Tenant-Screening Notice First-Time Landlords Can Miss

5 min read

A co-signer requirement or larger deposit can trigger an adverse-action notice when a consumer report influenced the decision. Know what the notice must explain before communicating different terms.

You review a rental application and decide you can accept it, but only with a co-signer. Because you are offering the home rather than rejecting the applicant, it may feel like an ordinary approval. If information from a consumer report influenced that condition, a federal notice requirement can still apply.

The FTC’s landlord guidance explains that an adverse action is an unfavorable decision affecting a rental applicant or tenant. It can include denial, a co-signer requirement, a deposit not required of another applicant, a larger deposit, or higher rent. The useful question is whether the report played any part in an unfavorable decision—not simply whether you said yes or no.

First, identify what you used

Consumer reports cover more than a conventional credit report. The FTC includes tenant-screening reports about rental or eviction history, criminal-history reports, screening-company risk scores or recommendations, and reports from services hired to check references. A screening service’s recommendation does not remove your responsibility for the rental decision.

Before obtaining a report, you need a permissible purpose and must certify to the reporting company that you will use it only for housing purposes. The FTC says landlords may obtain reports for applicants or tenants applying to rent or renew a lease, and may also obtain written permission to show a permissible purpose. Check applicable screening and consent rules before ordering; this guide focuses on the notice after an unfavorable decision.

An approval with different terms can require a notice

The notice is required when an adverse action is based partly or completely on information in a consumer report. The report does not have to be the main reason. The FTC also gives an example in which a report prompts further investigation and that investigation leads to denial: a notice is still required.

Illustrative example: your advertised terms call for a standard deposit. After reviewing a screening report, you offer one applicant a lease only with a larger deposit. Even though the applicant could still rent the home, the report influenced an unfavorable change, so the FTC’s guidance calls for an adverse-action notice. This example explains the notice trigger; it does not establish that the larger deposit is lawful.

A notice does not make an otherwise unlawful condition acceptable. State and local deposit limits, screening rules, and fair-housing requirements still matter. Have your policy and proposed terms checked for the property’s location rather than treating a screening company’s recommendation as legal clearance.

Check the contents, not just the label

Under the FTC guidance, the notice must include the following core information. An ordinary message saying “your application did not meet our standards” does not supply it.

  • The name, address, and phone number of the consumer reporting agency that supplied the report.
  • A statement that the reporting agency did not make the unfavorable decision and cannot give specific reasons for it.
  • The person’s right to dispute the accuracy or completeness of information the agency supplied, and to obtain a free report from that agency if requested within 60 days.

The FCRA allows these notices in writing, electronically, or orally, but the FTC recommends written notices because they help both parties document compliance and exercise their rights. Do not assume a vendor sent the notice: confirm who is responsible, review what was provided, and keep a record of delivery.

If you used a credit score in the adverse decision, additional written or electronic disclosures are required. The FTC lists the score, its source, the date it was created, the possible score range under that model, and the key factors that adversely affected the score in order of importance. Check that your notice covers the applicable requirements instead of relying on a generic rejection template.

Make the next step understandable

The CFPB’s applicant guidance explains why this matters: an applicant can request the report, review it, and dispute inaccurate or outdated information. A report may contain an error; a screening result is not proof that every detail is correct. Provide the reporting company’s contact information clearly so the person can use those rights.

As a practical records routine, note the decision, the criteria applied, which report influenced it, and the notice and delivery details. Keep sensitive application material secure and limit access. Follow applicable retention requirements and securely dispose of consumer-report information when it is no longer needed; do not leave it in a public or shared folder.

For your first rental, add one checkpoint before communicating a denial or conditional approval: did a consumer report influence an unfavorable decision, and does the required notice contain the right information? This is a focused overview of federal agency guidance, not a complete screening policy or legal advice. Investigative reports and other circumstances can bring additional obligations; get qualified help when the requirements or proposed terms are unclear.

Sources and further guidance

Want to make these routines easier to repeat?

The Landlord Launch Kit brings practical workflows, checklists, and templates together for self-managing rental owners.

Explore the Landlord Launch Kit